![]() ![]() Strava running side by side on IE 11 and Firefox 26. ![]() Strava will not detect the GCP on IE11, even though it happily uses it on Firefox running side-by-side. The current situation is – it simply does not work. Strava so far has not been very robust when it comes to the Garmin plugin on IE 11. Then things seemed to settle down, until I began using the Strava site in anticipation of getting Google Glass (Strava currently has the only “Glassware” apps for run and ride tracking). On more than one occasion I had to resort to Training Center, Garmin’s desktop app, to receive the activity from the device and save it to a TCX file for upload to the website. Things changed on an almost weekly basis when Microsoft pushed out an update that broke the plugin or the website, then Garmin fixed it and it worked again. Mass-storage, most serial devices) Support for Internet Explorer,įirefox and Chrome on Microsoft Windows.Ever since IE 11 came out earlier this fall, I have been having problems with uploading activities from my Garmin 305. Support for most Garmin devices (USB, USB Waypoint or favorite Read and write Garmin XML files (GPX and TCX) as Supported fitness devices Geo-code address and save to a device as a ![]() Recreational, fitness and navigation devices Read fitness data from Navigation devices Write tracks, routes and waypoints to supported Tracks, routes and waypoints from supported recreational, fitness and Product information like product name and software version Read I would try it from Google Chromium to see if it can be used instead of this reverse engineering.Īuto-detection of devices connected to a computer Access to device It seems OSX is supported, as well as Windows browsers. Unsure if this is what you're looking for but Garmin has created an API that runs with your browser. I'd recommend resetting the device so that it's "blank", dumping and storing the contents, then take a set of readings, record the results (whatever the device normally reports), then dump the contents again and try to correlate the recorded results with whatever data appeared after the "blank" dump. Keep in mind that lots of cheap A/D converters only produce 12-bit outputs, so your readings are unlikely to be larger than 16 bits (and the high-order 4 bits may be used for flags). You can try decoding the timestamp yourself, or you might try simply feeding it to ctime() and see if they're using standard absolute time format. There'll probably be a preamble of some sort, with a start timestamp and the sampling rate. If it's fixed intervals, then it'll probably be a simple vector of readings. If it's individual beats, then there's going to be a time delta (since the last beat), a duration, and a max or avg strength of some sort. ![]() Either they're recording each heart beat individually, or they're recording whatever the sensor is sending at fixed intervals. Think about what kind of data they're probably sending. Figure it's probably blocked in some power-of-two-sized chunks. I'd start by creating a hex dump of the data. I would also look for these protocols and see if any could be applied to the data I am seeing. Finding someone who works in the field of biomedical engineering would also be on my list, as they would probably know what protocols are typically used, if any. I would also check the manufacturer's website, or maybe run strings on their binaries. If I get garbage, then it is back to the drawing board :-) It is also entirely possible I need to process the data first before it looks anything like what their program is showing, i.e. If it does but not quite, then closer inspection would probably reveal you need some scaling factors here or there. Having formed a hypothesis for what is where, I would write a program to test it and graph the results and see if it makes sense. I would also look for bit fields which are monotonically increasing, as that would suggest some sort of time stamp. I would first capture many samples, and see if any pattern presents itself, since heart beat is something which is regular and that would suggest it is measurement related to the heart itself. I would start by seeing what data is being sent by the device, then consider how such data could be represented and packed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |